Tag Archives: drones

Drone war: every attack in Pakistan visualized

25 Mar

Drone war: every attack in Pakistan visualized

From The Guardian (http://gu.com/p/3eyxa)

Luminous Intervention at General Stanley McChrystal Foreign Affairs Symposium

4 Mar

Check out this video of our Luminous Intervention at General Stanley McChrystal’s talk at Johns Hopkins!

On Wednesday, Feburary 27th, we projected words and images onto Shriver Hall to bring attention to drone warfare and JHU’s involvement in drone weapons research and development. Our projection coincided with General Stanley McChrystal’s speech at the Foreign Affairs Symposium. We also presented this informational flyer.

Luminous Intervention is a group of artists and activists in Baltimore. They design, produce, and project “large-scale outdoor projections highlighting social and economic issues relevant to our city and its people.”

What’s so bad about drone warfare?

26 Feb

NEW FLYER: Download a PDF

What’s so bad about DRONE WARFARE?

Drone warfare is WRONG.

It’s wrong to kill people simply because they are suspected of crimes. It’s worse to send drones to rain missiles down on villages simply because people suspected of crimes live there. Hundreds of civilians have already been killed by U.S. drone strikes in Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia. If the U.S. and other countries expand the use of military drones, the carnage will increase exponentially.

“Do the United States and its people really want to tell those of us who live in the rest of the world that our lives are not the same value as yours?” — Archbishop Desmond Tutu

Drone warfare is ILLEGAL.

Extra-judicial killing outside of war zones is illegal under U.S. and international law.

“No person employed by or acting on behalf of the United States Government shall engage in, or conspire to engage in, assassination.” — President Ronald Reagan, U.S. Executive Order 12333

Drone warfare is RECKLESS.

“What scares me about drone strikes is how they’re perceived around the world. The resentment created by American use of unmanned strikes… is much greater than the average American appreciates. They are hated on a visceral level, even by people who’ve never seen one or seen the effects of one.” — General Stanley McChrystal (retired)

“Drones are an example of technology outpacing our morality and thinking.” — U.S. Navy Captain, quoted in Foreign Policy (12 Feb 2013)

So, why are we designing military drones at Hopkins?

JHU’s Applied Physics Laboratory (APL) has been deeply involved in developing technology for military drones, and huge new Pentagon contracts are now bringing drone weapons research to the Homewood campus. Because many of the university’s military contracts are classified, we do not yet know the full extent and nature of Hopkins’ drone research.

Why should you be concerned?

  • Targeted killing by drones is wrong, illegal, andreckless. But that’s only part of the problem. The technology itself is extremely dangerous. By allowing governments to dispatch robots instead of soldiers, drones make it easier to wage war anywhere, anytime. This is making the world a much more dangerous place.
  • The U.S. is waging drone warfare in secret and without democratic discussion. The technology is advancing faster than our consideration of the ethical, military, social, and environmental implications. Domestically, the use of drones to conduct wide surveillance and police the population violates our right to privacy and can easily be abused by the government.
  • Lucrative military contracts—especially those for drone warfare and weapons—are distorting university research and education. The secrecy demanded by military contracts violates the principles of open academic exchange and transparent university governance.

GET HOPKINS OUT OF DRONE WARFARE.

Download a PDF

Come to our Luminous Intervention before General Stanley McChrystal’s presentation at the JHU Foreign Affairs Symposium Wednesday 2/27 at 7:30pm!

Drone warfare in the press at Johns Hopkins

21 Feb

Article on drone weapons accuracy and criticisms in the JHU News-Letter

http://www.jhunewsletter.com/2013/02/21/new-drone-technology-enhances-accuracy-59314/


Derek Denman (Doctoral candidate, Political Science): Interview in Politik on APL drone research and the militarization of higher education

http://issuu.com/jhupolitik/docs/jhupolitik_special_issue_january2013


Rachel Cohen (JHU ’14): “Secrecy and Drones” in Politik

http://issuu.com/jhupolitik/docs/politikpressvol.13.iss.3_final_2


Shereen Shafi (JHU ’15): “‘Transparency,’ Drone Strikes, and the Conditions of Public Support” in Elias Isquith’s Jubilee

http://jubileeblog.com/2013/02/20/shereen-shafi-transparency-drone-strikes-and-the-conditions-of-public-support/

Anti-drone weapons activism spreading across US military bases, factories, universities

19 Jan

The Guardian“Critics of US drone programme angered by John Brennan’s nomination to CIA”

In the US the increased use of drones has given birth to a protest movement that has encompassed numerous groups all over the country. Anti-drone activists are now planning a major protest for Obama’s inauguration in Washington this month, and also a month of actions in April aimed at military bases where drones are controlled, factories where they are made and universities where drone research is carried out. “More people are waking up to this,” said Nick Mottern, director of a group called Know Drones.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jan/10/critics-us-drone-brennan-cia-nomination

Twitter timeline of U.S. drone strikes

12 Dec

From The Daily Beast: 

Josh Begley Tweets Entire History of U.S. Drone Attacks

For the past several years, Begley, who previously worked at an organization that uses technology to advance social-justice movements, has felt a nagging need to open Americans’ eyes to the reality of this method of warfare. Begley himself says he “started caring about the issue because I knew so little about [drones].” Then Jane Mayer’s 2009 New Yorker piece, “The Predator War,” which brought readers into the air-conditioned Langley, Va., offices from which drone attacks are ordered, got him thinking.

Drones “bring up all sorts of interesting questions about the intersection of technology and international law and human rights,” he told The Daily Beast. “A bureaucratic chain of command deciding to execute [people] outside any law is a very interesting concept intellectually.” And so, last summer, he set to work designing an app that would map U.S. strikes, to bring a far-away war into the palms of everyday Americans.

Full story at: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/12/11/josh-begley-tweets-entire-history-of-u-s-drone-attacks.html

Follow @dronestream on Twitter: twitter.com/dronestream

Johns Hopkins News-Letter story on “Living Under Drones at JHU”

29 Nov

Johns Hopkins News-Letter 

HRWG hosts panel on JHU drone research 

The debate over the U.S. military’s use of drones has been heating up in the media and on campus for some time now. In a recent panel held in Mergenthaler Hall, experts discussed the hot-button topic and specifically Hopkins’ involvement in classified drone research.

The event, hosted by the Hopkins Human Rights Working Group (HRWG), was co-sponsored by Amnesty International, the Graduate Representative Organization, the Departments of Anthropology and Political Science, the Arab Students’ Organization and Students for Environmental Action.

The two guest experts on the panel were James Cavallaro, the director of the International Human Rights and Conflict Resolution Clinic at Stanford Law School, and Omar Shakir, also of Stanford Law School. Both were co-authors of the recent Stanford and New York University (NYU) study titled “Living Under Drones.” Results of the study drew from interviews of about 130 Pakistanis directly and indirectly involved in drone attacks.

Full story at: http://www.jhunewsletter.com/2012/11/29/hrwg-hosts-panel-on-jhu-drone-research-87319/